[an error occurred while processing this directive]
g9 Logo
shopping cart rss xml Vol. 22, No. 3: October-November 2017
Rate This Page Poor page rating Fair page rating Average page rating Good page rating Excellent page rating
 
pix The Acoustic Guitar In The Mix, Part 1 pix
pix
pix pix by Tony Koretz  

Page added in April, 2005

About The Author

Tony Koretz is a musician, singer, songwriter and audio engineer, based in New Zealand. He is involved in all aspects of music production, from writing and playing music to recording, mixing and mastering.

He runs Rocksure Soundz Ltd, a recording and production company.

pic


For more information, visit Tony's site at www.koretzmusic.com. Comments may be directed to Tony Koretz.

© Tony Koretz

Sponsored Links





Print This Column

Click here for a printer-friendly version of "The Acoustic Guitar In The Mix, Part 1".

  OK, you have captured a really nice acoustic guitar sound on your song, so now what?

Well, you need to get it to relate to the other elements in the mix, and how you treat it is going to depend on several factors; the main ones being the type of music, and how many other elements (such as instruments and vocals) there are to have to get to fit together, to get a coherent song that glues together nicely. You would, for instance, treat the guitar in a folksy acoustic tune differently than you would an acoustic rhythm guitar track in a full rock mix with keys electric guitars etc. So we will look at two examples, and call one the folk mix and the other the rock mix.

OK, so what are the different arrows in your quill that you can use to hit the target you're aiming at - a balanced sound field within a song. Well, you have at your disposal a few, they are: compression, equalization, stereo positioning, volume and effects. Now I don't pretend to have all the answers, but I will just once again share some of the secrets that have worked for me.

Hmm, I guess that means they won't be secrets any more will they! Anyway, over the next two articles we'll have a bit of a look at each of them.

Compression

As I mentioned in my last article, I usually use a bit of compression during the process of recording the guitar. Not a whole heap, but a subtle amount. Now personally I don't like to pile more on here unless I really have to. Sometimes a bit here, maybe a light use of limiting with a high threshold, or mild compression with a ratio of between 2.5:1 and 5:1 can be used to enable you to raise the subjective volume level a bit ( or even a combination of the two),but as it is an acoustic instrument, I find if you hit it too hard you can lose the natural tone and dynamics, so it's kind of a last resort to me. So use discretion and try not to squash the life out of it.

Equalization

It is very hard to generalise as to what to do with EQ, as it is really going to depend on how dense the mix is, but here are a few guidelines that you may find helpful. I always heavily roll off or cut the very low frequences from the guitar. If the mix does not contain too many other instruments, and if the acoustic guitar is one of the main features, then I would tend to do this at somewhere below 65 hz, but in a rock mix I may take everything out below 80 or 90 hz. In the folk mix maybe a small boost in the 140-300 hz range, so long as it doesn't get boomy, whereas in the rock mix the boost might be in the 300-700 hz range. Another boost could be helpful further up the mid-range too. Try it at 1.5-2 khz for the folk mix, and maybe in the 2.5-3 khz range in the rock mix. In both cases a bit of a boost at round 7 khz can give the guitar a nice sparkle, and usually I do that there.

Right, so how much of a boost am I talking about here? Well, personally if I have to boost any frequency by more than 5-6 dB I start looking for answers elsewhere. In fact, I prefer to use subtractive EQ rather than boosting where possible. By this I mean if the guitar is getting buried in the mix, I look for a frequency to cut by a small amount in one or more of the other instruments, to create a nice hole for the guitar to punch through. I think a slight boost at a specific frequency for one instrument, with a corresponding small cut at around the same frequency in another instrument occupying the same range, often works better than cranking the heck out of the EQ to get it to "poke out" in a cluttered mx. Why? 'Cause, "if you got your ears on" my friend you will notice that the natural sound of the instrument changes, the phase relationship alters and it generally loses it's nice character. This applies equally to other instruments as well, though there are exceptions.

So to me, a little boost or cut in a few of the right places beats a heap in one place. Of course if you want your guitar to sound like it's being played through a transistor radio, ala "Wish You Were Here", then disregard all of this.In the end it all depends on what effect you are aiming for, and what else is in the mix.

In the next article we will look at volume, effects and positioning in the stereo field. Well, catchya then aye!

Rate This Column

pix Additional Columns by Tony Koretz pix
line
line


offer


Home | RSS | iTunes | T-shirts | Search
Card Cyber Museum | Contact Us | Content Index
Copyright © 1996-2013 Guitar Nine All Rights Reserved
Any redistribution of information found at this site is prohibited
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Guitar Nine Terms of Use. To read our Privacy Policy, click here.